PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA DALAM TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI PADA BIDANG JASA KONSTRUKSI DIPENGADILAN TIPIKOR YOGYAKARTA

Corruption in the procurement of goods and services is the most common and easy. This type of corruption is still conventional. Not really sophisticated, in this case it is done in ways such as markup, abuse of authority. Research on "Responsibility for Corruption in the Construction Services Sector at the Yogyakarta Corruption Court" is a research that is included in empirical normative legal research. The results of the research 1) The responsibility for criminal acts of corruption in the construction services sector at the Yogyakarta Corruption Court, based on decision Number 2 / Pid.Sus-TPK / 2020 / PN Yyk, Defendant Satriawan Sulaksono was legally and convincingly proven guilty of committing a criminal act of “corruption collectively- the same and continues "in the Second Alternative indictment, Imposing a crime against the Defendant is therefore subject to imprisonment for 1 (one) year 6 (six) months and a fine of Rp.50,000,000.00 (fifty million rupiah) provided that If the fine is not paid, it is replaced by a 1 (one) month imprisonment and the entire period of detention that has been served by the Defendant is determined to be deducted from the duration of the sentence imposed. 2) The policy for the formulation of the law on corruption that will come in enforcing the punishment for corruption in the construction services sector is based on the provisions of Article 284 paragraph (2) KUHAP jo. Article 17 PP No. 27 of 1983 jo. Article 26 of Law No. 31 of 1999 Jo. UU no. 20 of 2001 concerning the Eradication of Corruption jo. Article 44 paragraph (4) and Article 50 paragraph 1, 2, 3. Article 2 paragraph (2) Law no. 31 of 1999 jo. UU no. 20 of 2001 regulates the factor of weighting criminal sanctions against perpetrators of corruption, namely in the form of capital punishment. The factor is expressed by the phrase "certain circumstances".