ANALISIS SURAT KEPUTUSAN BERSAMA TIGA MENTERI TENTANG PERINGATAN DAN PERINTAH KEPADA PENGANUT, ANGGOTA, DAN/ATAU PENGURUS JEMAAT AHMADIYAH INDONESIA (STUDI KASUS KONFLIK ANTARA FRONT UMAT ISLAM DENGAN GERAKAN AHMADIYAH INDONESIA DI YOGYAKARTA TAHUN 2012)

This thesis discusses the analysis of three Ministers decree on Ahmadiyah (a case study of conflict between FUI and GAI in Yogyakarta, 2012. The analysis ministerial and the factors that cause of conflict is done by using the theory of critical discourse analysis of Norman Fairclough, Antonio Gramsci 's theory of hegemony, the theory of the cause of conflict by Simon Fisher, classical conflict theory Karl Marx and the contemporary conflict theory, which is represented by two schools, the positivistic (Ralph Dahrendorf and Lewis Coser) and humanist schools (Herbert Blumer and Peter L. Berger).
From the analysis, it can be concluded that the pros and cons that always arise in the process of production and consumption of three Ministers decree on Ahmadiyah. Groups for the Ahmadiyah have opinion that freedom must not be restricted because of the position as a citizen. Constitutional guarantees and product legislation related to human rights also guarantees it. The group cons have argues that the activities undertaken by the Ahmadiyah is incompatible with Islam. If Ahmadiyah still do the activitties, which can not themselves are Muslims.
This research also found that the factors causing conflict between FUI and GAI in Yogyakarta, 2012 are not a single. First, the GAI is considered an insult to the Muslim faith. Second, straying from MUI to GAI is the main reference for the rejection of GAI. Third, the differences in the understanding of the SKB about Ahmadiyah. Fourth, the unilateral allegations of each group, and the fifth, the exclusivity of GAI.