AFRIANSYAH TANJUNG (2015) THE INDONESIAN PARLIAMENT TYPE AFTER THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT DECISION NUMBER 92/PUU-X/2012. S1 thesis, UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH YOGYAKARTA.
![[thumbnail of HALAMAN PENGESAHAN]](https://etd.umy.ac.id/style/images/fileicons/text.png)
Text (HALAMAN PENGESAHAN)
HALAMAN PENGESAHAN.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only
Download (148kB)
Text (HALAMAN JUDUL)
HALAMAN JUDUL.pdf
Download (1MB)
Text (BAB I)
BAB I.pdf
Download (863kB)
Text (BAB II)
BAB II.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only
Download (1MB)
Text (BAB III)
BAB III.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only
Download (554kB)
Text (BAB IV)
BAB IV.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only
Download (6MB)
Text (BAB V)
BAB V.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only
Download (296kB)
Text (DAFTAR PUSTAKA)
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only
Download (669kB)
Abstract
ABSTRACT
Based on the previous analysis in the Chapter Four, it can be
concluded that the Indonesian Parliament Type after the Constitutional
Court Decision Number 92/PUU-X/2012 is soft bicameralism. The reason
is the Indonesian Parliament has two institutions or chambers which have
law making authority. Those are the DPR and the DPD. The DPR has
absolute authority in law making process but the DPD only has authority
related to the regional autonomy or regional interest. According to
Giovanni Sartori, the type of parliament can be seen from the law making
authority in Parliament. Giovanni Sartori has classified the theory of
bicameralism in three types, namely: soft/ weak bicameralism, strong
bicameralism and perfect bicameralism. In the case of the Indonesia, the
Parliament tvpe has adonted the theorv of Giovanni that the tuma ic Taft
| Item Type: | Thesis (S1) |
|---|---|
| Divisions: | Fakultas Hukum > Hukum S1 |
| Depositing User: | Editor Perpus |
| Date Deposited: | 27 May 2022 03:40 |
| Last Modified: | 27 May 2022 03:40 |
| URI: | https://etd.umy.ac.id/id/eprint/32075 |
Actions (login required)
- View Item