RINA YOZARNI RITONGA (2021) THE USE OF CROWN WITNESS IN PROVING MURDER CASE. S1 thesis, Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta.

[thumbnail of Halaman Judul] Text (Halaman Judul)
Halaman Judul.pdf
Download (1MB)
[thumbnail of Lembar Pengesahan] Text (Lembar Pengesahan)
Lembar Pengesahan.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Download (512kB)
[thumbnail of Abstrak] Text (Abstrak)
Abstrak.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Download (127kB)
[thumbnail of Bab I] Text (Bab I)
Bab I.pdf
Download (184kB)
[thumbnail of Bab II] Text (Bab II)
Bab II.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Download (330kB)
[thumbnail of Bab III] Text (Bab III)
Bab III.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Download (91kB)
[thumbnail of Bab IV] Text (Bab IV)
Bab IV.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Download (285kB)
[thumbnail of Bab V] Text (Bab V)
Bab V.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Download (92kB)
[thumbnail of Daftar Pustaka] Text (Daftar Pustaka)
Daftar Pustaka.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Download (233kB)
[thumbnail of Lampiran] Text (Lampiran)
Lampiran.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Download (530kB)
[thumbnail of Naskah Publikasi] Text (Naskah Publikasi)
Naskah Publikasi.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Download (892kB)
[thumbnail of Full Text] Text (Full Text)
Full Text.pdf
Restricted to Repository staff only
Download (2MB)

Abstract

The use and existence of crown witnesses have no explanation in the criminal procedure code, but in practice the use of crown witnesses is very often carried out and submitted by the public prosecutor as one of the evidence in the settlement of a criminal case. Supreme Court decision of the Republic of Indonesia Number: 1986K/Pid/1989 dated March 21, 1990 The decision explained that the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia did not prohibit the Public Prosecutor to apply for the use of a crown witness in the settlement of a case. The crown witness is considered to have a very good potential to reveal a crime, especially in cases of murder that lack evidence in the settlement process. As time went on, the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia issued a new decision, namely the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia No. 1592K/Pid/1994 dated 3 May 1995. The decision issued by the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia explained that if the crown witness was against the law, the law in question was the Criminal Procedure Code in which the Criminal Procedure Code highly upheld Human Rights.

Dosen Pembimbing: Muh Endriyo Susila, S.H., M.C.L., Ph.D. | NIDN0504097201
Item Type: Thesis (S1)
Divisions: Fakultas Hukum > S1 Hukum
Depositing User: Unnamed user with email robi@umy.ac.id
Date Deposited: 14 Dec 2021 06:50
Last Modified: 14 Dec 2021 06:53
URI: https://etd.umy.ac.id/id/eprint/5127

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item