AHMAD FAESOL (2016) ANALISA PERBANDINGAN PENGAMBILAN KEPUTUSAN INSOURCING DAN OUTSOURCING PADA PENGADAAN ALAT CHEMISTRY ANALYZER (STUDI KASUS DI RS PKU MUHAMMADIYAH YOGYAKARTA). S2 thesis, UNSPECIFIED.
HALAMAN JUDUL.pdf
Download (2MB)
LEMBAR PENGESAHAN.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Download (665kB)
ABSTRACT.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Download (495kB)
BAB. I.pdf
Download (2MB)
BAB. II.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Download (7MB)
BAB. III.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Download (1MB)
BAB. IV.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Download (12MB)
BAB. V.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Download (298kB)
DAFTAR PUSTAKA.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Download (545kB)
LAMPIRAN.pdf
Restricted to Registered users only
Download (8MB)
Abstract
Background: PKU Muhammadiyah hospital in Yogyakarta has B category ,acts as a referral hospital so that facilities should provide a more complete than other, such as labomtory serviccs with the higher spesffication. PKU Muhammadiyah hospital in Yogyakarta is one of the hospitals belonging Muhammadiyah, operating with missionary spirit, helper misery of the poor. Six years ago PKU Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta purchases TMS Chemistry laboratory analyzcr tool, but has never done an evaluation of the purchase of such equipment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the decision and how to purchase the right tools.
Method: Take measurements or calculations components of income and expensc components of TMS Chemistry analyzer tool and then analyzed by the method of NPV and PBP to determine whether the purchase of the device is beneficial for hospital. Then do a comparalive analysis bctween insourching purchases by outsourcing so that it can be seen thc most benefit for the hospital with the method of outsourcing or insourcing.
Results: Results of analysis of investment calculations TMS chemistry analyzer with the NPV method is 3,704,186,691.91 (NPV> 0). While analysis with Payback Period (PP) without disconto obtained the 1 year 8.2 months. Calculation of costs by way of comparison insourcing investment is 1.216.172.998, while the outsourcing investment showed 1.520.447.459 so that the difference of the method that is 304.274.461. The calculation shows the investment method insourcing has efficiency 20% compared to the method of oulsourcing investment.
Conclusion: Decision-making laboratory equipment purchases TMS Chemistry Laboratory Unit analyzer at RS PKU Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta own right. How to purchase insourching aspect more cost efficient than with oulsourcing.
Item Type: | Thesis (S2) |
---|---|
Uncontrolled Keywords: | insourcing, outsourcing, chemistry analyzer |
Divisions: | Fakultas Pasca Sarjana > Administrasi Rumah Sakit S2 |
Depositing User: | Unnamed user with email robi@umy.ac.id |
Date Deposited: | 23 Feb 2024 09:12 |
Last Modified: | 23 Feb 2024 09:12 |
URI: | https://etd.umy.ac.id/id/eprint/44609 |